Wednesday, 28 June 2006

International Courts & Tribunals at a Glance (No. 9)

International Courts & Tribunals at a Glance, a juscogens.net feature, aims to provide timely notice of recent happenings and trial developments in an organized, central location and an unbiased, objective manner. For comments or suggestions, please contact editor@juscogens.net.

International Court of Justice (ICJ)

Case concerning the Status vis-à-vis the Host State of a Diplomatic Envoy to the United Nations (Commonwealth of Dominica v. Switzerland)

  • Case removed from the Court’s List at the request of Dominica (12 June 2006). The ICJ indicated that "on 6 June 2006, the Prime Minister of the Commonwealth of Dominica informed the Court that his Government “d[id] not wish to go on with the proceedings instituted against Switzerland” and requested the Court to make an Order “officially recording [their] unconditional discontinuance” and “directing the removal of the case from the General List”.

Cases under deliberation:

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro)

Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay)

  • Conclusion of the public hearings on provisional measures (9 June 2006) From the ICJ, "Two rounds of public hearings were held on Thursday 8 and Friday 9 June 2006 at the Peace Palace, The Hague, seat of the Court. In them Argentina reiterated its request for the indication of provisional measures, arguing inter alia that the mills posed a serious threat to the ecosystem of the River Uruguay. Uruguay asked the Court to reject Argentina’s request, contending that the conditions required for the indication of provisional measures had not been satisfied."
  • Case Resources

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)

Overview of Court Proceedings

Overview of Court Documents

Court Schedule

ICTY Weekly Press Briefing (28 June 2006)

President Pocar Updates Security Council on Tribunal's Mission and Completion Strategy (7 June 2006)

  • From the ICTY, "In his speech President Pocar informed Members of the progress made in proceedings since he last briefed the Security Council in December 2005. Noting that the Trial Chambers had heard six trials simultaneously while managing 22 cases in the pre-trial stage, he expressed particular satisfaction that the first of three major multi-accused trials involving a total of 21 accused persons commenced in April 2006 and that the other two cases were set to begin in July, several months earlier than initially planned. He further noted that the Appeals Chamber has disposed of 127 appeals, including 3 judgements. The President recalled that to date, 161 persons have been charged by the Tribunal and proceedings against 94 accused have concluded. In addition, the Appeals Chamber has concluded 12 ICTR cases and proceedings involving 16 accused."
  • Full-Text of Speech

Tribunal's Prosecutor Addresses Security Council on Completion Strategy Progress (7 June 2006)

  • From the ICTY, "The Tribunal’s Prosecutor, Carla Del Ponte, used the opportunity of her address to the UN Security Counsel to provide her assessment of the progress made in the completion strategy and to highlight the problems and obstacles hampering it. She focused her address on the steps taken or suggested internally by her Office in order to increase the efficiency of the Tribunal. This effort targeted three aspects of the Tribunal’s activity: - the Prosecutor’s initiative to join cases with a similar crime base; - her second initiative, taken under the pressure of the completion strategy and despite the strong resistance of some victim groups, was to propose the transfer of cases involving mid-and lower-level perpetrators to the national courts; - an finally the Prosecutor’s suggestions regarding all possible measures to ensure that the Tribunal’s own process is as efficient as possible; in this regard since 2003 several packages of reforms were put forward by her Office."
  • Full-Text of Speech

Internal report into Milan Babic's Death Concludes no Criminal Conduct (9 June 2006)

Dario Kordic and Zoran Zigic Transferred to Austria to Serve their Prison Sentences (9 June 2006)

Dragan Zelenovic in Tribunal Custody; Dragan Zelenovic Initial Appearance (10 June 2006)

  • From the ICTY, "Dragan Zelenovic was today brought into the Tribunal's custody after almost ten years on the run. Zelenovic, a former Bosnian Serb policeman indicted for a range of war crimes including torture and rape committed in and around the south-eastern Bosnian town of Foca in 1992, was transferred from Bosnia and Herzegovina following an order of the country's State Court. The Tribunal acknowledges the cooperation provided by the Bosnian authorities regarding the expeditious transfer of Zelenovic from the Bosnian capital, Sarajevo, to the seat of the Tribunal in The Hague. Zelenovic arrived in Sarajevo on Thursday 8 June 2006 having been expelled from the territory of the Russian Federation by the authorities there. He had been arrested by Russian security forces in August 2005 but not transferred to the Tribunal." Zelenovic made his initial appearance on 13 June 2006.

Prlic et Al. Case: Trial Chamber III Returns from On-site Visit to Bosnia And Herzegovina (12 June 2006)

  • According to the ICTY, "Trial Chamber III of the ICTY (Judges Antonetti, presiding, Prandler and Trechsel) today returned to The Hague from a six-day on-site visit to Bosnia and Herzegovina, where the judges visited locations relevant to the proceedings in the case of Prlic et al. Members of the Prosecution and the Defence also participated in the visit. In the Prlic et al. case, six high-level leaders of the Bosnian Croat wartime entity Herceg-Bosna are on trial for their alleged responsibility for war crimes against Bosnian Muslims and other non-Croats from areas in south-western and central Bosnia and Herzegovina. The indictment focuses on alleged crimes committed in the municipalities of Prozor, Gornji Vakuf, Jablanica, Mostar, Ljubuski, Stolac, Capljina and Vares."

Dragan Nikolic Transferred to Serve Sentence in Italy (23 June 2006)

Two AD LITEM Judges Sworn in (27 June 2006)

  • The ICTY announced "Judge Ali Nawaz Chowhan (Pakistan) and Judge Tsvetana Kamenova (Bulgaria) were sworn in today as ad litem, or temporary, judges of the Tribunal. The UN Secretary General appointed both Judges as ad litem judges to sit on the Milutinovic et al. trial, involving six former Serb and Yugoslav political, military and police leaders, which is due to commence on 10 July 2006."

Trial Chamber Orders Arrest of Former Bosnian Serb Premier for Contempt (27 June 2006)

  • The ICTY indicated that "Trial Chamber I of the Tribunal today issued an arrest warrant against Branko Djeric, a former Prime Minister of Republika Srpska, the Bosnian Serb-dominated entity of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and directed Bosnian authorities to detain and transfer him to the Tribunal's seat in The Hague to face charges of contempt of court. Judges in the trial against former Bosnian Serb political leader Momčilo Krajisnik had earlier this month on 8 June 2006 issued a subpoena ordering Djeric to appear as a witness in the case on Monday 26 June 2006. Djeric 's failure to appear before the Trial Chamber or to show good cause why he could not comply with the subpoena triggered the issuance of the arrest warrant." The ICTY noted that "in accordance [sic] the Tribunal's Rules the Judges have the authority to call witnesses to assist them in the adjudication of a case. Djeric is one of several witnesses that Judges in the Krajisnik case have called. The Prosecution concluded the presentation of its evidence on 22 July 2005, the defence case commenced 10 October 2005."

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)

Daily Journal

Daily Case Minutes

Judicial Calendar

ICTR Newsletter (May 2006)

ICTR President and Prosecutor Address the Security Council (8 June 2006)

UN Security Council Extends Mandate of ICTR Permanent Judges (14 June 2006)

  • From the ICTR, "the United Nations Security Council yesterday unanimously extended the mandate of all eleven permanent judges of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda until 31 December 2008. This will facilitate the implementation of the ICTR Completion Strategy."

ICTR Appeals Chamber takes Judicial Notice of Genocide in Rwanda (20 June 2006)

  • "The Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda on 16 June 2006 ruled that the Trial Chambers must take judicial notice of the following facts: 1. The existence of Twa, Tutsi and Hutu as protected groups falling under the Genocide Convention; 2. The following state of affairs existed in Rwanda between 6 April 1994 to 17 July 1994: there were throughout Rwanda widespread or systematic attacks against a civilian population based on Tutsi ethnic identification. During the attacks, some Rwandan citizens killed or caused serious bodily or mental harm to person[s] perceived to be Tutsi. As a result of the attacks, there were a large number of deaths of persons of Tutsi ethnic identity; 3. Between 6 April 1994 and 17 July 1994 there was genocide in Rwanda against Tutsi ethnic group."
  • As the ICTR describes, "This land mark decision was delivered by the Appeals Chamber on Prosecutor's Appeal on Judicial Notice, dated 16 June 2006, in the trial of Prosecutor v. Karemera, Ngirumpatse and Nzirorera, ICTR-98-44-AR73 (C). The decision will have an immediate impact on the trial proceedings in the Karemera et al case, and will be felt in all of the current and pending trials before the Trial Chambers of the ICTR. Judicial notice of the above matters means that they are to be taken as established beyond any dispute and not requiring any proof. This is one of the most significant rulings of the Tribunal, given the consequences in terms of putting the occurrence of the genocide beyond legal dispute. It can be recalled that until now the OTP has had to in each case lead evidence and prove the occurrence of the genocide. This will no longer be necessary. In the view of the OTP the ruling should now silence the ‘rejectionist’ camp which has been disputing the occurrence of genocide. By relieving the OTP of a substantial burden of proof the ruling has the potential to shorten the cases as each will essentially focus on the personal involvement of the accused person in genocide"

Final Submissions Presented in Seromba’s Trial (28 June 2006)

  • From the ICTR, "On 27 and 28 June 2006, the Prosecution and the Defence in the case of Athanase Seromba, a Catholic priest formerly assigned to the Nyange Parish in Kivumu commune, Kibuye préfecture, Rwanda, presented their final submissions before Trial Chamber III of the United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. Seromba is charged with genocide, complicity in genocide (an alternative count), conspiracy to commit to genocide and extermination as a crime against humanity. He is alleged to have helped plan the killing of Tutsis in his area during the genocide of 1994 and to have ordered his church to be bulldozed while there were still more than 2,000 refugees sheltering inside, causing their death."

Latest Decisions

The Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL)

Court Schedule

Court Summary, Week Ending 9 June 2006

Special Court Registrar Welcomes United Nations Security Council Resolution (16 June 2006)

  • From the SCSL, "The Registrar of the Special Court, Mr Lovemore Munlo SC, has welcomed today’s Chapter 7 Security Council Resolution, which clears the way for the trial of Charles Taylor to be held in The Hague. “Resolution 1688 provides the legal basis for the Government of the Netherlands to conclude a Headquarters Agreement with the Special Court for Sierra Leone,” Mr Munlo said. “This was a necessary step before the Special Court could make a determination on whether Charles Taylor should be tried in The Hague”. The Security Council Resolution calls the presence of Mr Taylor in the subregion “an impediment to stability and a threat to the peace”, and asks the Secretary-General “as a matter of priority” to assist in making the legal and practical arrangements for the transfer of Mr Taylor to the Netherlands, and for the provision of all necessary facilities for the conduct of his trial."

Justice Thompson Elected Presiding Judge of Trial Chamber I (19 June 2006)

International Criminal Court (ICC)

Hearing Schedule

The Special Court for Sierra Leone to use ICC Facilities for Trial of Charles Taylor (21 June 2006)

  • From the ICC, "On 20 June 2006, the Special Court for Sierra Leone (Special Court) transferred Mr. Charles Taylor to the detention centre of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague for the purpose of using the facilities of the ICC during his trial, in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) concluded by the ICC and the Special Court on 13 April 2006. The trial will be conducted by a Trial Chamber of the Special Court sitting in The Hague. The ICC will not conduct the trial of Mr Taylor. Under the terms of the MOU, the ICC will provide courtroom services and facilities, detention services and facilities and related assistance. All costs will be paid in advance by the Special Court, through a Trust Fund established by the ICC Registrar. This arrangement will not affect the functioning of the ICC."

Situations & Cases:

Situation in Dafur, Sudan

Tuesday, 06 June 2006

International Courts & Tribunals at a Glance (No. 8)

International Courts & Tribunals at a Glance, a juscogens.net weekly feature, aims to provide timely notice of recent happenings and trial developments in an organized, central location and an unbiased, objective manner. For comments or suggestions, please contact editor@juscogens.net.

International Court of Justice (ICJ)

Cases under deliberation:

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro)

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)

Overview of Court Proceedings

Overview of Court Documents

Court Schedule

ICTY Weekly Press Briefing (31 May 2006)

ICTY Plenary Discusses Ways to Expedite Court Proceedings (31 May 2006)

Judges of the ICTY "met in a plenary session 30 May 2006 in which they discussed methods to better organise trials, particularly at the pre-trial stage, in order to ensure more expeditious proceedings. The main outcome of the meeting is anticipated amendments to the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure and Evidence that are expected shortly. A Judge, the Prosecutor or the Registrar can make proposals for an amendment to the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure and Evidence. During a plenary session, the permanent Judges discuss the proposal which is adopted only if agreed to by not less than ten of the Judges. A change, once accepted, enters into force seven days after the Tribunal issues an official document containing the amendment."

Release of Internal Report Into Slobodan Milosevic's Death (31 May 2006)

The ICTY released the report of the internal inquiry into the death of Slobodan Milosevic in the Tribunal's Detention facility on 11 March 2006. The findings of the the report include: "Nothing has been found to support allegations reported in some sections of the media that Mr. Milosevic had been murdered, in particular by poisoning. The results of the independent investigation by the Dutch authorities demonstrate that such allegations are entirely false."

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)

Daily Journal

Daily Case Minutes

Judicial Calendar

Joseph Serugendo sentenced to six years imprisonment (2 June 2006)

From the ICTR, "Joseph Serugendo, a member of the governing board of the Radio Television Libre des Mille Collines (RTLM) and of the National Committee of the Interahamwe za MRND, was today sentenced to six years imprisonment. He had pleaded guilty to direct and public incitement to commit genocide and persecution as a crime against humanity. Serugendo admitted to having provided technical assistance and moral support to the RTLM in order to ensure its ability to continuously disseminate an anti-Tutsi message both prior to and during the genocide. He further acknowledged having used his influence within the MRND and Interahamwe to incite others to kill or cause serious harm to members of the Tutsi population, with the aim of destroying the Tutsi ethnic group." Additionally, the ICTR noted that Serugendo has been diagnosed with a terminal illness. Serugendo agreed to a plea agreeemend on 16 Februruary 2005 after being arrested in Gabon on 16 September 2005.

Latest Decisions:

The Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL)

Court Schedule

Court Summary, Week Ending 26 May 2006

Latest Decisions:

International Criminal Court (ICC)

Hearing Schedule

Situations & Cases:

Situation in Uganda

  • Interpol issues first ICC Red Notices (1 June 2006) From the ICC, "the International Criminal Police Organisation - Interpol - issued Red Notices for the arrest of the five Lords Resistance Army commanders named in ICC arrest warrants. These are the first wanted persons notices to be issued by Interpol following a request by the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court.... The Interpol Red Notice system is part of its global network of law enforcement agencies, created to assist in tracing and arresting internationally wanted fugitives. The Red Notices are issued for the arrest of Joseph Kony, Vincent Otti, Okot Odhiambo, Raska Lukwiya and Dominic Ongwen. These individuals are wanted for trial at the International Criminal Court for multiple counts of crimes against humanity and war crimes including murder, abduction, sexual crimes, rape and child conscription."

Friday, 02 June 2006

International Courts & Tribunals at a Glance

International Courts & Tribunals at a Glance, a juscogens.net weekly feature, aims to provide timely notice of recent happenings and trial developments in an organized, central location and an unbiased, objective manner. For comments or suggestions, please contact editor@juscogens.net.

International Court of Justice (ICJ)

Cases under deliberation:

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro)

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)

Overview of Court Proceedings

Court Schedule

ICTY Weekly Press Briefing (24 May 2006)

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)

Daily Journal

Daily Case Minutes

Judicial Calendar

ICTR Newsletter, April 2006

Transfer of Bagaragaza case to the Kingdom of Norway Denied (22 May 2006)

From the ICTR, "On 19 May 2006 the bench appointed by the President of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda composed of judges Dennis C. M. Byron, Jai Ram Reddy and Joseph Asoka Nihal de Silva denied the Prosecutor’s motion for referral to the Kingdom of Norway of the case of Michel Bagaragaza. The motion was filed on 15 February 2006 under Rule 11bis of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the Tribunal. In its ruling the Trial Chamber found that the Kingdom of Norway does not have jurisdiction over the alleged crimes in the indictment against Michel Bagaragaza and in that case there was no need for the Chamber to consider the other requirements for referral as provided in Rule 11bis or in the Parties’ submissions."

Latest Decisions:

The Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL)

Court Schedule

Court Summary, Week Ending 26 May 2006

International Criminal Court (ICC)

Hearing Schedule

Situations & Cases:

Situation in Democratic Republic of Congo

Wednesday, 24 May 2006

International Courts & Tribunals at a Glance

International Courts & Tribunals at a Glance, a juscogens.net weekly feature, aims to provide timely notice of recent happenings and trial developments in an organized, central location and an unbiased, objective manner. For comments or suggestions, please contact editor@juscogens.net.

International Court of Justice (ICJ)

Cases under deliberation:

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro)

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)

Overview of Court Proceedings

Court Schedule

ICTY Weekly Press Briefing (17 May 2006)

Tribunal Welcomes Independent Audit of its Detention Unit (15 May 2006)

From the ICTY: "The Tribunal welcomes the issuance of the Independent Audit of the ICTY's Detention Unit carried out by a team of experts under the auspices of the Government of Sweden. The audit, a full version of which is released today, was requested by the Tribunal in order to further enhance the transparency of the Detention Unit (DU) following the 11 March 2006 death of Slobodan Milosevic....Numerous observations and proposals are made in the audit including, most notably: a review of arrangements regarding administrative court orders; enhanced contacts between the DU and the Dutch host prison; a review of management structures; practical issues concerning support elements to inmates and the separation of detainees enjoying the presumption of innocence from those who have been found guilty and are awaiting transfer to serve their sentence."

President Pocar Arrives On A Working Visit To Sarajevo (15 May 2006)

From the ICTY, "Judge Fausto Pocar, President of the ICTY, arrived today on a three-day working visit to Sarajevo on his first visit to the Bosnian capital in his capacity as head of the Tribunal....A principal focus of his visit is the State Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, a close partner of the Tribunal which it is working to support and strengthen in order to cement the rule of law in the country, as well as a safeguard against impunity for war criminals. The Tribunal has to date transferred six intermediate and lower rank accused to Bosnia and Herzegovina for trial before the State Court’s War Crimes Chamber. It has also provided considerable materials to assist further indictments and cases, as well as being engaged in a broad range of capacity building activities."

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)

Daily Journal

Daily Case Minutes

Judicial Calendar

ICTR Newsletter, April 2006 (available from 15 May 2006)

Latest Decisions:

Military I (Bagosora et al.), Case No. : ICTR-98-41-T, DECISION ON MOTION TO PRECLUDE A JOINT RESPONSE, 15 May 2006

Butare (Nyiramasuhuko et al.), Joint Case No. ICTR-98-42-T, DECISION ON KANYABASHI'S ORAL MOTION TO CROSS-EXAMINE NTAHOBALI USING NTAHOBALI'S STATEMENTS TO PROSECUTION INVESTIGATORS IN JULY 1997, 15 May 2006

Military I (Bagosora et al.), Case No. : ICTR-98-41-T, DECISION ON PROSECUTION REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO BAGOSORA MOTION, 16 May 2006

THE PROSECUTOR v. Aloys SIMBA, Case No. ICTR-01-76-A, NOTICE ON PROSECUTOR'S MOTION WITHDRAWING MOTION REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL FILINGS, 17 May 2006

Karemera et al., Case No. ICTR-98-44-T, DECISION ON DEFENCE MOTIONS CHALLENGING THE PLEADING OF A JOINT CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE IN A COUNT OF COMPLICITY IN GENOCIDE IN THE AMENDED INDICTMENT: Articles 2 and 6(1) of the Statute, 18 May 2006

THE PROSECUTOR v. Michel BAGARAGAZA, Case No. ICTR-2005-86-R11bis, DECISION ON THE PROSECUTION MOTION FOR REFERRAL TO THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY: Rule 11 bis of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, 19 May 2006

Military I (Bagosora et al.), Case No. : ICTR-98-41-T, DECISION ON NZIRORERA REQUEST FOR ACCESS TO PROTECTED MATERIAL, 19 May 2006

The Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL)

Court Schedule

Court Summary, Week Ending 19 May 2006

New President for the Special Court for Sierra Leone (15 May 2006)

From the SCSL, "Justice George Gelaga King of Sierra Leone has been elected Presiding Judge of the Appeals Chamber, a post which makes him President of the Special Court for a period of one year. Justice King will succeed as President Justice Raja Fernando of Sri Lanka, whose term ends on 26 May."

AFRC Accused (Brima, Kamara, Kanu), Case No. SCSL-04-16-T, Decision on confidential joint Defence motion as to inability to provide details of certain witnesses on 10 May 2006 and anticipation of subpoenas ad testificandum, 17 May 2006

RUF Accused (Sesay, Kallon, Gbao), Case No. SCSL-04-15-T, Decision on Defence motion for an order directing the Prosecution to effect reasonably consistent disclosure, 18 May 2006

AFRC Accused (Brima, Kamara, Kanu), Case No. SCSL-04-16-T, Decision on joint Defence motion for protective measures for Witness DBK-088, 19 May 2006


International Criminal Court (ICC)

Hearing Schedule

Situations & Cases:

Situation in Democratic Republic of Congo

Wednesday, 17 May 2006

International Courts & Tribunals at a Glance

International Courts & Tribunals at a Glance, a juscogens.net weekly feature, aims to provide timely notice of recent happenings and trial developments in an organized, central location and an unbiased, objective manner. For comments or suggestions, please contact editor@juscogens.net.

International Court of Justice (ICJ)

Cases under deliberation:

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro)

    Oral Pleadings:

Pending cases:

Application Instituting Proceedings Concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay)

From the ICJ on 11 May 2006: "The International Court of Justice (ICJ) will hold public hearings on Thursday 8 and Friday 9 June 2006 on the request for the indication of provisional measures submitted on 4 May 2006 by Argentina in the proceedings brought by it against Uruguay concerning alleged breaches by Uruguay of obligations incumbent upon it under the Statute of the River Uruguay, a treaty signed by Argentina and Uruguay on 26 February 1975."

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)

Overview of Court Proceedings

Court Schedule

ICTY Weekly Press Briefing (10 May 2006)

Ivica Rajic Sentenced to 12 Years' Imprisonment (8 May 2006)

The ICTY, "sentenced Ivica Rajic to 12 years’ imprisonment for his involvement in the October 1993 attack against the central Bosnian village of Stupni Do, which caused the death of approximately 31 civilians and the destruction of the village. He was also sentenced for his role in the rounding up of more than 250 Muslim men in the nearby town of Vares and their subsequent inhuman treatment." Read the full statement.

Zeljko Mejakic, Momcilo Gruban, Dusan Fustar and Dusko Knezevic transferred to Bosnia and Herzegovina (9 May 2006)

From the ICTY, "Zeljko Mejakic, Momcilo Gruban, Dusan Fustar and Dusko Knezevic were transferred today from the custody of the Tribunal to Bosnia and Herzegovina to be tried in the country’s State Court in Sarajevo. The four Bosnian Serbs are charged with a broad range of war crimes committed during the early stage of 1992-1995 Bosnian conflict against Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs in the Omarska and Keraterm camps near Prijedor in northwest Bosnia and Herzegovina. Specifically, they are charged with confining in inhumane conditions, murdering, beating, sexually assaulting, harassing, humiliating and psychologically abusing non-Serbs in camps between May and August 1992. . . .The Tribunal’s Referral Bench ruled on 20 July 2005 that the case be transferred to Bosnia and Herzegovina under the terms of 11 bis of the Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure and Evidence. Both the prosecution and defence appealed the decision and the prosecution later withdrew their appeal. On 7 April 2006, the appeals chamber granted the transfer."

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)

Daily Journal

Daily Case Minutes

Judicial Calendar

Latest Decisions:

The PROSECUTOR v. Juvenal RUGAMBARARA, Case No. ICTR-00-59-I, DECISION ON THE MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE MEASURES FOR DEFENCE WITNESSES, 8 May 2006

  • Synopsis: Trial Chamber II of the ICTR denied a request of the Defence for Juvenal Rugambarara, seeking protective measures for potential witnesses pursuant to Articles 19 to 21 of the ICTR Statute and Rules 69 and 75 of the ICTR Rules. The Court denied the request due to insufficient supporting evidence demonstrating that such protective measures are applicable: "the Defence has not provided any independent material that demonstrates that the fears of its potential witnesses are well founded. The Chamber reiterates that without any such material, it is left to speculate about the security situation of potential witnesses and no reasoned decision on protective measures can be made."

Emmanuel Ndindabahizi (Appellant) v. THE PROSECUTOR (Respondent), Case No. ICTR-01-71-A, SCHEDULING ORDER, 11 May 2006

THE PROSECUTOR v. THARCISSE MUVUNYI, ICTR-2000-55A-T, REASONS FOR THE ORAL DECISION ON MUVUNYI'S MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION TO APPEAL THE CHAMBER;S DECISION OF 26 APRIL 2006, 12 May 2006

The Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL)

Court Schedule

Court Summary, Week Ending 12 May 2006

Prosecutor v. Alex Tamba Brima, Brima Bazzy Kamara, & Santigie Borbor Kanu, Case No. SCSL-04-16-T, Decision on Prosecution motion to bring forward the next scheduled status conference, 8 May 2006

Prosecutor v. Issa Hassan Sesay, Morris Kallon, & Augustine Gbao, Decision on Prosecution motion to amend protective measures for Witnesses TF1-168 and TF1-041, Case No. SCSL-04-15-T, 9 May 2006

International Criminal Court (ICC)

Hearing Schedule

Situations & Cases:

Situation in Democratic Republic of Congo

Tuesday, 09 May 2006

International Courts & Tribunals at a Glance

International Courts & Tribunals at a Glance, a juscogens.net weekly feature, aims to provide timely notice of recent happenings and trial developments in an organized, central location and an unbiased, objective manner. For comments or suggestions, please contact editor@juscogens.net.

International Court of Justice

Application Instituting Proceedings:

Application Instituting Proceedings Concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay)

Cases under deliberation:

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro)

    Case Resources
   
    Oral Pleadings:

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)

Overview of Court Proceedings

Court Schedule

ICTY Weekly Press Briefing (3 May 2006)

Appeals Chamber Confirms Sentences Against Mladen Naletilic and Vinko Martinovic (3 May 2006)

From the ICTY, "In its Judgement, the Appeals Chamber dismissed the vast majority of the grounds of appeal raised by both sides. The Appeals Chamber also set aside, in part, a few of the convictions entered by the Trial Chamber against Naletilic and Martinovic. However, taking into account the particular circumstances of this case as well as the form and degree of the participation of the accused in the crimes affirmed on appeal, as well as the seriousness of those crimes, the Appeals Chamber found that the sentences imposed by the Trial Chamber against them were within the range that a reasonable Trial Chamber could have ordered. It therefore confirmed their sentences to 20 and 18 years' imprisonment, respectively."

Address by Carla Del Ponte, Prosecutor of the ICTY, at the International Conference (5 May 2006)

Blagoje Simic Granted Temporary Provisional Release (5 May 2006)

From the ICTY, "The Appeals Chamber granted Blagoje Simic’s motion for temporary provisional release to attend memorial services for his mother in Samac, a border town in the north of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Blagoje Simic will be provisionally released from 10 to 25 May 2006....    On 25 October 2003, Blagoje Simic was sentenced to 17 years’ imprisonment for crimes against Bosnian Muslim and Bosnian Croat civilians in Bosanski Samac. At the time, Simic was the highest ranking civilian official in the Bosanski Samac municipality. Both the prosecution and defence appealed the judgement. The Appeals Chamber's decision is pending."

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)

Daily Journal

Daily Case Minutes

Judicial Calendar

Latest Decisions

Closing arguments in Mpambara‘s Trial (4 May 2006)

From the ICTR, "On 2 and 3 May 2006, the Prosecution and the Defence in the case of Jean Mpambara, the former bourgmestre of Rukara commune in Kibungo prefecture, presented their final submissions before Trial Chamber I of the United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. The Prosecution called for the conviction of the Accused and the imposition of a life imprisonment sentence. It argued that evidence presented in court proved that he truly committed genocide. It added that the evidence shows that the Accused organized and executed killings which occurred in Rukara commune, including at the Gahini Hospital and Rukara Parish, during which more than 2,500 persons were killed. The Prosecution further argued that Mpambara took part in a number of massacres of Tutsi civilians in Rukara commune in eastern Rwanda, between 7 and 16 April1994. The Defence called for Mpambara’s acquittal, arguing that his implication in the terrible crimes of which he is accused was not proven by the Prosecutor. It added that the evidence shows that the Accused never committed the crimes, and that the witnesses called by the Prosecutor were unreliable."

The Special Court for Sierra Leone

Court Schedule

Court Summary, Week Ending 5 May 2006

Prosecutor v. Charles Ghankay Taylor, Case No. SCSL-03-1-PT, Decision on Confidential Prosecution Motion for Immediate Protective Measure For Witnesses and for Non-Public Disclosure and Urgent Request for Interim Measures AND on Confidenital Prosecution Motion for Leave to Substitute a Corrected and Supplemented List as Annex A of the Confidential Prosecution Motion for Immediate Protective Measures for Witnesses and for Non-Public Disclosure and Urgent Request for Interim Measures (5 May 2006)

International Criminal Court (ICC)

Hearing Schedule

Situations & Cases:

Situation in Democratic Republic of Congo

Situation in Uganda

International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea

Statements of the President

Wednesday, 03 May 2006

International Courts & Tribunals at a Glance

International Courts & Tribunals at a Glance, a juscogens.net weekly feature, aims to provide timely notice of recent happenings and trial developments in an organized, central location and an unbiased, objective manner. For comments or suggestions, please contact editor@juscogens.net.

International Court of Justice

Application Instituting Proceedings:

Application Instituting Proceedings Concerning Violation of Rules Concerning Diplomatic Relations (Commonwealth of Dominica v. Switzerland)

Cases under deliberation:

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro)

    Oral Pleadings:

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)

Overview of Court Proceedings

Court Schedule

ICTY Weekly Press Briefing (24 April 2006)

Trial in the Prlic et al. Case Began on 26 April 2006

From the ICTY, "The trial for the six high-level leaders of the Bosnian Croat wartime entity, Jadranko Prlic, Bruno Stojic, Slobodan Praljak, Milivoj Petkovic, Valentin Coric and Berislav Pusic will begin on Wednesday, 26 April 2006 at 2:15 p.m. in Courtroom III The charges against the accused focus on ethnic cleansing of Bosnian Muslims and other non-Croats from areas in the territory of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina which were claimed to be part of the so-called Herceg-Bosna, declared as a political and territorial entity in November 1991. The charges include, among others, murder, rape, sexual assault, destruction of property, imprisonment, deportation and forcible transfer. The indictment concentrates on crimes committed in the municipalities of Prozor, Gornji Vakuf, Jablanica, Mostar, Ljubuski, Stolac, Čapljina and Vares."

Ad Litem Judge Sworn in (25 April 2006)

From the ICTY, "Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua was sworn in today as ad litem, or temporary, judge of the Tribunal. The UN Secretary General appointed Judge Mindua as a reserve ad litem judge to sit on the Prlic et al. case, involving the six high-level leaders of the Bosnian Croat wartime entity. Security Council resolution 1660 (2006) permits the UN Secretary General to appoint, at the request of the Tribunal President, reserve judges from the Tribunal’s pool of 27 ad litem Judges to specific trials. Reserve judges will be present at each stage of a trial and may replace a judge on a bench if he or she is unable to continue sitting."

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)

Judicial Calendar

Latest Decisions

THE PROSECUTOR v. ATHANASE SEROMBA, Case No. ICTR-2001-66-T, DECISION ON MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGES (25 April 2006)

THE PROSECUTOR vs. THARCISSE MUVUNYI, Case No. ICTR-2000-55A-T, DECISION ON THE PROSECUTOR'S MOTION PURSUANT TO TRIAL CHAMBER�S DIRECTIVES OF 7 DECEMBER 2005 FOR THE VERIFICATION OF THE AUTHENTICITY OF EVIDENCE OBTAINED OUT OF COURT PURSUANT TO RULES 89 (C) & (D) (26 April 2006)

THE PROSECUTOR v. Protais ZIGIRANYIRAZO, Case No. ICTR-2001-73-T, DECISION ON THE DEFENCE MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE OF VOIR DIRE EVIDENCE (27 April 2006)

THE PROSECUTOR v. KAREMERA ET AL., Case No. ICTR-98-44-AR73.6, DECISION ON JOSEPH NZIRORERA’S INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL (28 April 2006)

The Special Court for Sierra Leone

Court Schedule

Court Summary, Week Ending 28 April 2006

Special Court Prosecutor to Step Down (28 April 2006)

International Criminal Court (ICC)

Hearing Schedule

The ICC Presidency Approves Regulations of the Registry (19 April 2006)

Situations & Cases:

Situation in Darfur, Sudan

Situation in the Central African Republic

Situation in Democratic Republic of Congo

Situation in Uganda

Monday, 24 April 2006

International Courts & Tribunals at a Glance

International Courts & Tribunals at a Glance, a juscogens.net weekly feature, aims to provide timely notice of recent happenings and trial developments in an organized, central location and an unbiased, objective manner. For comments or suggestions, please contact editor@juscogens.net.

International Court of Justice

To celebrate its sixtieth anniversary, the International Court of Justice held a solemn sitting in the Peace Palace (12 April 2006)

Cases under deliberation:

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro)

Oral Pleadings 

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)

Overview of Court Proceedings

Court Schedule

ICTY Weekly Press Briefing (19 April 2006)

Decision Rendered on Referral of the Pasko Ljubicic Case under Rule 11 Bis (12 April 2006)

The ICTY Referral Bench decided "to refer the case of Pasko Ljubicic to Bosnia and Herzegovina in accordance with Rule 11bis of the Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure and Evidence. This decision can be appealed." To be referred "pursuant to Rule 11bis, the Referral Bench, comprised of three judges, has to order a referral of its own accord or following a request from the Prosecutor. A decision to refer a case is rendered only if the Bench is fully satisfied that the accused would be tried to the highest international standards and that neither the level of responsibility of the accused nor the gravity of the crimes alleged in the indictment were factors that would make a referral to the national authorities inappropriate. In addition to the four persons already transferred, currently a total of 11 other persons are or may be considered for transfer by the Referral Bench."

Vladimir Kovacevic Declared Unfit to Stand Trial (12 April 2006)

From the ICTY, Vladimir Kovacevic faced charges for " his involvement in the attack against the historic city of Dubrovnik in Croatia in 1991. Specifically, Kovacevic is charged with murder, cruel treatment, attacks on civilians, devastation not justified by military necessity, unlawful attacks on civilian objects as well as destruction or wilful damage done to institutions dedicated to religion, charity, and education, the arts and sciences, historic monuments and works of art and science committed in the attack on 6 December 1991." Kovacevic was provisionally released for medical treatment in 2004. On 2 December 2004, the Chamber extended the accused's provisional release until further notice. During Kovacevic's release, " the Chamber ordered a number of medical reports and carefully considered all of them. In reaching its decision [to declare Kovacevic unfit], the Chamber found that the accused does not have the capacity to plead, to understand the nature of the charges, to understand the course of proceedings, to understand the details of the evidence, to instruct counsel, to understand the consequences of proceedings, and to testify."

Haradin Bala Granted Temporary Provisional Release (20 April 2006)

The ICTY Appeals Chamber granted Haradin Bala, sentenced 30 November 2005 to 13 years for mistreatment of prisoners, torture, and murder, "temporary provisional release to attend his daughter’s memorial service on 26 April 2006 in Kosovo. Haradin Bala is provisionally released from 23 to 27 April 2006, to allow him to spend the traditional mourning period with his family and community preceding the memorial service." As the ICTY noted, "the provisional release is subject to specific terms and conditions laid out in the decision. They include UNMIK's responsibility to take custody of the accused at Pristina airport and ensure his 24-hour protection and supervision, as well as compliance with conditions of the provisional release while he is in Kosovo.

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)

Judicial Calendar

Latest Decisions

Karemera, et al., DECISION ON JURISDICTIONAL APPEALS: JOINT CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE (12 April 2006)

Bisengimana Sentenced to 15 Years Imprisonment (13 April 2006)

From the ICTR, "Trial Chamber II of the United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda today sentenced Paul Bisengimana (58), former Bourgmestre of Gikoro Commune, Kigali-Rural Prefecture, to 15 years in prison after it convicted him of extermination as a crime against humanity.... On 7 December 2005 Bisengimana pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting murder and extermination as crimes against humanity. The Chamber accepted his plea and found him guilty of murder and extermination as crimes against humanity."

Karemera, et al., DECISION ON RECONSIDERATION OF THE SCHEDULING ORDER FOR THE NEXT TRIAL SESSION Article 20 of the Statute of the Tribunal, Rule 73 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence (18 April 2006)

Karemera, et al., DECISION ON DEFENCE MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF PROFESSOR ANDRE GUICHAOUA Article 20 of the Statute and Rule 94 bis (A) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence (20 April 2006)

The Special Court for Sierra Leone

Court Schedule

Judicial Recess 10-24 April 2006

The Prosecutor's Meeting with Civil Society of Sierra Leone, 31 March 2006 (12 April 2006)

International Criminal Court (ICC)

Hearing Schedule

The ICC Presidency Approves Regulations of the Registry (19 April 2006)

Situations & Cases:

Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo

Situation in Darfur, Sudan

Situation in the Central African Republic

Situation in Democratic Republic of Congo

Situation in Uganda

Permanent Court of Arbitration

Barbados/Trinidad and Tobago, Award of the Arbitral Tribunal (11 April 2006)

Monday, 10 April 2006

International Courts & Tribunals at a Glance

International Courts & Tribunals at a Glance, a new juscogens.net weekly feature, aims to provide timely notice of recent happenings and trial developments in an organized, central location and an unbiased, objective manner. For comments or suggestions, please contact editor@juscogens.net.

International Court of Justice

    Cases under deliberation: Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)

    ICTY Convicts Enver Hadzihasanovic and Amir Kubura (15 March 2006)

From the ICTY, "In the first Tribunal judgement to deal with the presence of foreign Muslim or Mujahedin combatants in central Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Trial Chamber found that Enver Hadzihasanovic exercised effective control over a detachment of such forces. It found that Mujahedin members severely beat and psychologically abused five civilians from the Croatian and Serbian community in Travnik and murdered Dragan Popovic in October 1993 in the Orasac camp. The Trial Chamber found Enver Hadzihasanovic guilty of failing to prevent these crimes."

    Appeals Chamber Confirms Milomir Stakic's Conviction (22 March 2006)

The ICTY appeals chamber "affirmed the Trial Chamber’s decision to convict Milomir Stakic for his responsibility in exterminating, murdering and persecuting the non-Serb population in Prijedor. The Appeals Chamber also found that the Trial Chamber incorrectly failed to convict him for deporting and forcibly transferring the non-Serb population. The Appeals Chamber agreed with the Trial Chamber’s decision to acquit Milomir Stakic of genocide and complicity in genocide."

    Final Independent Dutch Inquest Results Concerning Death of Slobodan Milosevic (4 April 2006)

The final results from an independent Dutch inquest confirm that Slobodan Milosevic "died of natural causes and rules out any suggestion of criminal conduct." The ongoing, separate ICTY inquiry into Milsosevic's death will now "focus its attention on issues relating to the medical treatment provided to Slobodan Milosevic while in the Tribunal's detention facility. The internal inquiry expects to conclude its investigation on these issues shortly."

   Two Ad Litem Judges Sworn in (7 April 2006)

Judges Stefan Trechsel (Switzerland) and Arpad Prandler (Hungary) were sworn in as ad litem judges on 7 April 2006. Judges Trechsel and Prandler "were appointed by the Secretary General to serve on the Prlić et al. case, which involves six former high ranking political and military officials of the so-called "Croatian Community (and later Republic) of Herceg-Bosna", charged with the ethnic cleansing of Muslims and other non-Croats who lived in the area. The trial is scheduled to start later this year."

    Appeals Chamber Upholds Decision to Refer the Mejakic et al. Case to Bosnia and Herzegovina

From the ICTY, "the Appeals Chamber upheld the decision to refer the Mejakic et al. case, involving four accused, to Bosnia and Herzegovina for trial. The Appeals Chamber dismissed eight of the grounds in the Joint Defence Appeal, and allowed one in part." The transfer is "a partnership with the judiciaries in the former Yugoslavia...while the most senior leaders are tried before the ICTY, intermediate and lower rank accused can be referred to competent national jurisdictions. The ICTY has previously transferred two accused to Bosnia and Herzegovina for trial and referred one case involving two accused to Croatia."

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)

The Special Court for Sierra Leone

International Criminal Court (ICC)

Permanent Court of Arbitration

Khmer Rouge Trials

Friday, 31 March 2006

Prosecutor v. Milosevic: Termination of Proceedings, Inquiry, and Case Resources

On Tuesday, 14 March 2006, the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia ("ICTY") terminated the proceedings against Slobodan Milosevic. Milosevic died in the detention unit of the ICTY on 11 March 2006. Both the ICTY and Dutch authorities are performing an investigation into Milosevic's death. Although it suffered a premature end, the trial of Milosevic at the ICTY created a voluminous, detailed record.

Titrelogoe_2I. Termination of Proceedings By the ICTY Against Slobodan Milosevic (Case No. IT-02-54 "Kosovo, Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina")

Milosevic faced charges for genocide, crimes against humanity, violations of the laws or customs of war, and grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Convention. In the indictments, Milosevic faced charges based upon both individual criminal responsibility and superior criminal responsibility as President of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, Supreme Commander of the Yugoslav Army, and President of the Supreme Defence Council. These charges were presented in three separate indictments, commonly referred to as "Kosovo, Croatia, and Bosnia," for events occurring between 1991 and 1999. The ICTY's Case Information Sheet presents an excellent summary of each indictment, including a description of the facts that served as the foundation of the Prosecutor's case. Milosevic's death ended the lengthy trial against him, as demonstrated by the over 49,000 pages of transcripts. In announcing the termination of the proceedings on 14 March 2006, Judge Robinson stated that Milosevic's "untimely death has deprived not only him but indeed all interested parties of a judgment upon the allegations in the indictment. His death terminates these proceedings. We express our thanks to all those who participated in these long and difficult proceedings over the past four years and who contributed to the Chamber's consideration of the many issues that arose during the trial."[1]

II. Inquiry into Milosevic's Death by ICTY and Dutch Authorities

Aside from the termination of the proceedings, the ICTY also established a separate inquiry into the events surrounding Milosevic's death. This ICTY inquiry is separate and distinct from the investigation being performed by Dutch authorities. The ICTY's Rules of Detention are the basis of the separate investigations by the ICTY and Dutch authorities. Under Rule 33 of the ICTY's Rules of Detention, "in the event of the death of a detainee, an inquest will be conducted in accordance with the legal requirements of the Host State." Additionally, Rule 33 states that the "[ICTY] President may order an inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the death or serious injury of any detainee."[2]

As the Host State under Rule 33 of the ICTY's Rules of Detention, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, has undertaken an independent investigation into Milosevic's death. The Headquarter Agreement between the United Nations and the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands establishing the ICTY also provides guidance in establishing the nature and extent of the Dutch inquiry into Milosevic's death. Article XXI (2) of the Headquarter Agreement states that the ICTY "shall cooperate at all times with the competent authorities to facilitate the proper administration of justice, secure the observance of police regulations and prevent the occurrence of any abuse in connection with the privileges, immunities and facilities accorded under [the Headquarter Agreement]."[3] Provisional findings by the the Public Prosecutor's Office of The Hague indicated that Milosevic died from a heart infarction.[4]

The separate ICTY inquiry is under the order of the ICTY President, Judge Fausto Pocar, and being led by ICTY Vice-President, Judge Kevin Parker. Pursuant to this inquiry, the ICTY Trial Chamber I considered whether the ICTY inquiry into Milosevic's death could access the confidential materials of the Prosecutor v. Milosevic case record.[5] On 16 March 2006, Trial Chamber I of the ICTY ordered the ICTY Registrar to "grant the authorities of The Netherlands and Judge Parker full access to the Milosevic case file, and supply them with any materials they request."[6]

In addition to the two inquiries of Milosevic's death by the ICTY and the Netherlands, on 30 March 2006 the Swedish Government accepted the ICTY's request to conduct an independent audit of the ICTY Detention Unit.[7]

III. Prosecutor v. Milosevic Case Resources: Background, Indictments, Transcripts of Proceedings, Judgments, Decisions, and Orders

A. Background & Overview

B. Indictments

Kosovo

Croatia

Bosnia

C. Transcripts of Proceedings (49,000+ pages)

D. Judgments, Decisions & Orders:

E. Death of Milosevic & Inquiry

[1] ICTY, Case No. IT-02-54, Transcript of proceedings, p. 49,191, March 14, 2006, available at < http://www.un.org/icty/transe54/060314IT.htm>

[2] ICTY, RULES GOVERNING THE DETENTION OF PERSONS AWAITING TRIAL OR APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL OR OTHERWISE DETAINED ON THE AUTHORITY OF THE TRIBUNAL, rule 33, as amended July 21, 2005, available at < http://www.un.org/icty/legaldoc-e/basic/detention/detindex.htm>.

[3] ICTY, AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED NATIONS AND THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS CONCERNING THE HEADQUARTERS OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE PROSECUTION OF PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR SERIOUS VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW COMMITTED IN THE TERRITORY OF THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA SINCE 1991, art. XXI(2), May 27, 1994, available at <http://www.un.org/icty/legaldoc-e/basic/cooperation/headindex.htm>.

[4] H.J. Moraal, Senior Public Prosecutor, "Provisional findings concerning the death of S. Milosevic," March 17, 2006, available at <http://www.un.org/icty/milosevic/report-english.htm>.

[5] ICTY, ORDER ASSIGNING A TRIAL CHAMBER TO CONSIDER GRANTING ACCESS TO CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS IN A CASE, Case No. IT-02-54-T, March 14, 2006, available at <http://www.un.org/icty/milosevic/trialc/order-e/060314.pdf>.

[6] ICTY, ORDER LIFTING CONFIDENTIALITY OF RELEVANT MATERIALS FOR INVESTIGATION PURPOSES, Case No. IT-02-54-T, March 16, 2006, available at <http://www.un.org/icty/milosevic/trialc/order-e/060316.htm>.

[7] ICTY, SWEDISH GOVERNMENT ACCEPTS TRIBUNAL REQUEST TO AUDIT THE DETENTION UNIT, March 31, 2006, AM/MO/1060e, available at <http://www.un.org/icty/pressreal/2006/p1060-e.htm>.

Thursday, 15 December 2005

Courts & Tribunals: Ante Gotovina Pleads Not Guilty Before International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)

On 12 December 2005 former Croatian General Ante Gotovina plead not guilty to seven counts under an amended indictment before the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.[1] Gotovina, arrested on 7 December in the Canary Islands by Spanish authorities and thereafter transferred to the ICTY's Detention Unit, faces charges of: persecutions, murder, plunder of property, wanton destruction of cities, town or villages, deportation and forced displacement, and other inhumane acts.

Originally indicted on 8 June 2001, the Prosecutor presented an amended indictment to the ICTY on 19 February 2004. The factual basis of the indictment concerns the August 1995 Croatian military offensive known as "Oluja" or "Storm" (Operation Storm), which aimed to retake the Krajina region of Croatia. According to the indictment, Gotovina "was the overall operational commander of the Croatian forces that were deployed as part of Operation Storm in the southern portion of the Krajina region, including the municipalities, in whole or in part, of Benkovac, Gracac, Knin, Obrovac, Sibenik, Sinj and Zadar."[2]

Gotovina is charged with both individual and superior criminal responsibility under the indictment. Specifically, the indictment charges Gotovina with individual criminal responsibility, under Article 7(1) and 7(3) of the Statute of the Tribunal, with persecutions on political, racial and religious grounds, deportation and other inhumane acts and plunder of public or private property and wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages under Article 3 of the Statute. Additionally, Gotovina is charged with individual criminal responsibility of a superior under Article 7(3) of the Statute. These counts include inhumane acts and murder.[3]

Further Information:

[1] ICTY, Prosecutor v. Gotovina, Case No. IT-01-45, Amended Indictment, Feb. 19, 2004, available at http://www.un.org/icty/indictment/english/got-ai040224e.htm.
[2] Id. at para. 4.
[3] Id. at para. 6-41.

Monday, 12 December 2005

Courts & Tribunals: International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) Sentences Miroslav Bralo to 20 Years Imprisonment

On 7 December 2005 the Trial Chamber of the ICTY sentenced Miroslav Bralo to 20 years imprisonment in the case Prosecutor v. Miroslav Bralo. On 19 July 2005 Bralo entered a guilty plea on 8 counts including persecutions, murder, torture, inhuman treatment, and unlawful confinement.[1]

I. Background: Procedural & Factual History

Miroslav Bralo also known as "Cicko," was a member of the 4th Military Police Battalion of the Croatian Defense Council (HVO), also known as the "Jokers." From January 1993 until mid-July 1993, the HVO engaged in an armed conflict with Bosnia and Herzegovina government forces. The HVO attacked villages inhabited by Bosnian Muslims in the Lašva River Valley region in central Bosnia and Herzegovina. These attacks resulted in the death and wounding of numerous civilians. Additionally, other civilians were subject to detention, transport, torture, and other physical and mental abuse. Specifically, the indictment against Bralo alleged that "on 16 April 1993, Miroslav Bralo participated, with others, in the surprise attack on the village of Ahmici. The purpose and objective of the attack were to ethnically cleanse the village, to kill all the Muslim males of military age, to burn all Muslim residences, and to forcibly expel all the Muslim residents from the village."[1] The indictment also specifically charged Miroslav Bralo with the confinement and repeated rape and torture of a Bosnian Muslim woman and also alleged that Bralo "individually and in concert with others did use and participated in the using of civilians as "human shields" in forcing Bosnian Muslim civilians to dig trenches on the front lines to protect HVO soldiers from gun fire by ABiH snipers".[2]

Originally indicted in November 1995, Bralo surrendered on 10 November 2004 in Bosnia and Herzegovina and was transferred to the ICTY. On Tuesday 19 July 2005, Miroslav Bralo pled guilty to eight counts before the ICTY, Trial Chamber I. The offenses include: one count of persecutions on political, racial and religious grounds, a crime against humanity; one count of murder, a violation of the laws or customs of war; one count of torture or inhuman treatment, a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions; one count of torture, a violation of the laws or customs of war; one count of outrages upon personal dignity including rape, a violation of the laws or customs of war; two counts of unlawful confinement, a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions; and, one count of inhuman treatment, a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions.[3]

II. Applicable Law

Accepting Bralo's guilty plea, the ICTY Trial Chamber considered the applicable law relevant to sentencing. Articles 24 and 27 of the ICTY Statute establish the nature of sentences and their enforcement imposed by the Tribunal.[4] Article 24 directs the Trial Chamber when determining terms of imprisonment to "have recourse to the general practice regarding prison sentences in the courts of the former Yugoslavia."[5] Additionally, Article 24 instructs the Trial Chamber to "take into account such factors as the gravity of the offence and the individual circumstances of the convicted person."[6] If an accused is convicted on a guilty plea, Rule 100 of the ICTY permits the submission of any relevant information by the Prosecutor and defense "that may assist the Trial Chamber in determining an appropriate sentence."[7] In determining sentences, Rule 101 of the ICTY also instructs the Trial Chamber to take into account: any aggravating circumstances; any mitigating circumstances including the substantial cooperation with the Prosecutor by the convicted person before or after conviction; the general practice regarding prison sentences in the courts of the former Yugoslavia; and, the extent to which any penalty imposed by a court of any State on the convicted person for the same act has already been served.[8]

In Bralo's sentencing judgment, the Trial Chamber acknowledged it must "consider a number of factors in its assessment of the appropriate sentence to be imposed upon Bralo," but the court also recognized that "the sentence imposed is a matter for the discretion of the Trial Chamber after examining the particular facts of the case."[9] In the judgment the Trial Chamber also addressed the various purposes of punishment when determining any sentence. Specifically, the court noted it should consider retribution, deterrence, and rehabilitation to varying degrees.[10]

III. Sentencing Factors Utilized by the ICTY

In deciding the length of the sentence to be given to Bralo, the Trial Chamber considered the g